Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 23/08/2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-17, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2014-15 raising following grounds:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order dated 30/08/2018 passed by the Learned CIT(Appeals)-21, New Delhi [in short ‘the Learned CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2010-11 raising following grounds:

Aggrieved by the order dated 28/9/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), New Delhi (“Ld. CIT(E)”) in the case of the Delhi Welfare And Recreational Club Fund, Delhi (“the appellant”) rejecting the application for grant of registr

 This appeal by the Revenue is directed against order dated 27/09/2018 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2011-12 raising following grounds:

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 20/06/2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Gurgaon [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2016-17 against the order passed under section 143(1) of the

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 18/09/2019 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2016-17, raising following grounds:

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 5/12/2019 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi-13 [in short �the Ld. CIT(A)�] for assessment year 2011-12 raising following grounds:

This appeal filed by the revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee are directed against the order dated 27.4.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-11, Bengaluru and they relate to the assessment year 2009-10. The issues urged in these appeals relate

These cross appeals are directed against order dated 31.5.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-14, Bengaluru and they relate to the assessment year 2009-10. At the time of hearing, both the parties ubmitted that the tax effect involved in the appeal filed by th