The petitioner is an exporter and importer through the Land Customs Stations at Agartala. He carries on his business under name and style of M/s Goutam Ray. On 26.12.2020 the petitioner had imported soybean oil of net volume of 55,200 kg. in 5000 car
This appeal filed by the assessee for AY 2016-17 is directed against the CIT(A) - 2, Hyderabad’s order,dated 26/08/2019 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act” on the following grounds of appeal:
This is Revenue’s appeal filed for the Assessment Year 2013-14 against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Hyderabad Dt.20.07.2017.
These Revenue’s appeals for AYs.2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 arise from the CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad’s orders; all dated 16-08-2018 passed in appeal Nos.0175 / 15-16 / ACIT,Cir.16(2) / CIT(A)-4 / Hyd / 17-18, 0008 / 16-17 / ACIT,Cir.16(2) / CIT(A)-4 / Hyd /
This is assessee’s appeal for the Asst. Year 2016-17 filed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6,Hyderabad dt.7.6.2019.
This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2018-19 against the order of the CIT (A)-6, Hyderabad, dated 22.10.2019.
This appeal is filed by assessee through his representative against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–21, New Delhi, for assessment year 2008-09 wherein appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Dy. Commissioner of Income
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 31/1/2017 passed by DCIT, Circle (1)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C (13) of the Income Tax, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14.
Aggrieved by the order dated 29/9/2017 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi (“the Ld. CIT(A)”) in appeal No. 88/2016-17/CIT (A)-44, for the assessment year 2013-14, in the case of M/s Barring Pvt. Ltd partners (In
This appeal is filed by the assessee company for assessment year 2009-10 against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–23, New Delhi, dated 15.11.2017.