Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
Order in contravention of the provisions of S. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Guest 03 June 2021 at 11:59
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 26.04.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee gainst the order dated 27.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].
The present appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the orders all dated 31.10.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’]. ITA 54/CHD/2020 is taken up first for adjudication.ITA 54
Heard Mr. J. D. Mistri, learned senior counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel revenue for respondent No.1; and Mr. R. V. Desai, learned senior counsel for respondent No.2.
Subject matter and reliefs sought for in all the writ petitions being identical, those were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, learned counsel for the respondents.
By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to forthwith grant and sanction interest on the refund amount after expiry of three months from the respective dates of applicatio
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the counsels for the parties, heard fnally at the stage of admission.
Blueblood Ventures Limited Vs Deuty Commissioner of Income Tax
Guest 01 June 2021 at 10:45
It is the petitioner’s case that it owed monies to an entity, going by the name, Shridham Distributors Private Limited [in short 'SDPL']. According to the petitioner, the debt owed to SDPL was defrayed, by transferring Zero Coupon Optionally Convert
These petitions have been filed by the petitioner challenging the Show Cause Notice(s) dated 29.01.2020 and the consequent Order(s) dated 05.06.2020 and the Communication(s) dated 03.09.2020 of the respondent no. 1, proceeding with the inquiry agains
CAclubindia
