Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
When is addition beyond the scope of section 153A of the Income Tax Act?
Guest 23 July 2021 at 15:20
The present appeals have been filed by the revenue against the orders of ld. CIT (A)-27, New Delhi dated 24.11.2017.
Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D in respect of exempted income
Guest 23 July 2021 at 15:20
ITA No.781/Del/2018 and ITA 1208/Del/2018 are cross appeals by the assessee and revenue preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-7, New Delhi dated 05.12.2017 pertaining to A.Y. 2013-14.
The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of ld. CIT(A)-32 , New Delhi dated 26 .10.2017.
In M/s. Sattva CFS & Logistics Private Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs [Custom Appeal No. 41681 of 2021 decided on July 15, 2021] M/s. Sattva CFS & Logistics Private Limited ('the Appellant') contended that the Directorate of Revenue Intellige
Refund cannot be denied on account of procedural lapse
Bimal Jain 23 July 2021 at 14:00
In M/s Origin Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax [Service Tax Appeal No.40599 of 2017 decided on July 20, 2021] M/s Origin Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. ("the Appellant") is engaged in providing Information Technology Services
In Nagri Eye Research Foundation v. Union of India[R/Special Civil Application No. 7822 of 2021 decided on July 9, 2021] Nagri Eye Research Foundation ('the Petitioner') filed an application for advance ruling to determine whether GST Registration wo
In DCIT v. Sahara India SahkariAwas [ITA Nos.2481 & 2482/Del/2011 and CO Nos.221 & 222/Del/2011 decided on July 19, 2021] Sahara India SahkariAwas ('the Respondent'), a cooperative society of Sahara India group and is engaged in the business of devel
No penalty leviable unless the conduct of the assessee is found to be contumacious
Bimal Jain 23 July 2021 at 09:13
In M/s. Aanya Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [ITA No. 115/Mum/2020 decided on July 20, 2021] M/s. Aanya Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. ('the Appellant') is a real estate company. During assessment, it was noted that the Petitioner had disclosed payment f
Penalty cannot be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so
Bimal Jain 22 July 2021 at 13:02
In M/s Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited v. the State of Karnataka [S.T.R.P. No. 433 of 2017 decided on July 1, 2021] M/s Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited ('the Petitioner') is engaged in the activity of manufacture and sale
This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 30.01.2013 of CIT(Appeals)-III, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2007-08.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
