Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

These three appeals filed by revenue and three cross objections filed by assessee for A.Y. 2009-10 to 2011-12, arise from order of the CIT(A)-1, Ahmedabad dated 06-04-2015, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “th

This is an appeal by the assessee against the final order of assessment dated 18.11.2016 of the DCIT, Circle –1(1)(2), Bengaluru, passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’), for Assessment Y

This is an appeal by the Revenue against the final order dated 11.11.2016 of CIT, Hubli, relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue reads as follows:

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 28.12.2016 passed by the A.O. for assessment year 2013-14 u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144 C of the Act in pursuance to the directions given by Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 25.03.2019 of CIT(A)-2, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2013-14.

This appeal by the Assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–10, Bangalore, dated 8.3.2019 in relation to assessment year 2013-14.

This appeal by the Assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–7, Bangalore, dated 29.11.2019 in relation to assessment year 2016-17.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 4.2.2020 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-1 Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the A.O

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Abdul Mannan Khan v. the GST Council &Ors. [WPA 236 of 2020 dated January 04, 2021] declined to interfere in a matter and dismissed the petition of the assessee seeking rectification of the Form GSTR-1 for the perio

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in K.I. International Ltd. v. the Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) [W.P. No. 16328 of 2020 dated June 23, 2021] set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department rejecting the claim of the assessee that disentitled th