Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

 This appeal is filed by the assessee against order dated 30/08/2017 passed by CIT(A)-Ghaziabad, for assessment year 2013-14.

Aggrieved by the order dated 16/10/2017 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, New Delhi ("Ld. CIT(A)") for theassessment year 2014-15, Modern Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (“the assessee”) filed this appeal.

Aggrieved by the order dated 19.03.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Delhi ("Ld. CIT(A)") in thecase of M/s Mason Infrastructure Private Limited (“the assessee”), for the assessment year 2013-14, assessee preferred this appea

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-38, New Delhi dated 24.01.2019. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon dated 26.02.2019. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-11, New Delhi dated 16.08.2019. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Hisar dated 28.02.2019. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Noida dated 28.09.2018. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

In Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 6(2), Mumbai v. Board of Cricket Control in India, Wankhede Stadium, D Road, Marine Drive, Mumbai 400 020 [PAN: AAATB0186A] ITA No. 2914/Mum/2017, the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circl

In Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata v. Batanagar Education and Research Trust  [Civil Appeal No. 4451 of 2021], the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata ('the Appellants') and the Tribunal had directed for cancellation of