Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3 passed u/s 271(1)(c) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Captioned appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 23.10.2019 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)�14, Mumbai for the assessment year 2016-17

This is assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2005-06 against the order of CIT(Appeals)-4, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2016. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal.

This appeal is filed by Revenue while the Cross Objection is filed by the assessee, against the order of CIT(A)-1, Hyderabad dated 26.10.2017 relating to A.Y. 2014-15.

This is assessee�s appeal filed against the order of CIT(A)-7, Hyderabad dated 26.11.2018 relating to A.Y. 2014-15.

This is assessee's appeal for the Assessment Year 2008-09 against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Hyderabad Dt.15.11.2019 confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer.

This is assessee's appeal for the Assessment Year 2015-16 against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Hyderabad dt.17.10.2019

In Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli ('IIMT/ the Applicant') vide order no. 20/AAR/2021 dated June 18, 2021 the Hon’ble Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling ('TAAR') held that, Applicant is a government entity liable to TDS provision

In the matter of M/s. KLF Nirmal Industries Pvt. Limited [Order No. 19/ARA/2021 dated June 18, 2021], M/s. KLF Nirmal Industries Pvt. Limited ('the Applicant') has sought the Advance Ruling before the Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling ('AAR')

In the matter of M/s. Perfect Probuild P. Ltd. v. DCIT, Circle 76(1) [ ITA No. 1034/Del/2018 order dated August 05, 2021] before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”), Delhi, it is held that, TDS has to be deducted u/s 194C of Income Tax Act, 19