Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21st February, 2017 of the CIT(A)-38, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2003-04.

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-10, New Delhi dated 30.03.2017.

This is an appeal by the assessee directed against the order of learned CIT(A) dated 30.9.2019 pertains to A.Y. 2020-11.

The present appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the orders of even date 23rd October 2019, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–8, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2009–10 and 2010–11.

The only grievance of the assessee in aforesaid appeals for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 & 2016-17 is disallowance u/s 14A. The facts are pari-materia the same in both the years and therefore, the appeals were heard together and are now being dispose

This appeal by the revenue is against order of learned CIT(A)-40, Mumbai dated 23/10/2019.

The above titled cross appeals have been preferred by the assessee as well as by Revenue against the order dated 20.11.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax.

In Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal v. Commissioner (Appeals) [Service Tax Appeal No. 53294 of 2018-SM dated July 26, 2021], Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal ('the Appellant&'), transporter of goods and other products has filed the current appeal challenging the Order-in-Ap

The Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan, the bench of Jaipur observed 'Taking into consideration the assessment order dated 21.04.2021, the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner prima facie appears to be correct accordingly. In the meanwhile,

The judgment could pave the way for corporates under stress in the current environment to restructure their interest payment as debentures or other instruments, and deduct the same for income tax purposes. This is provided the lender recognises such