Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, set aside the judgment of the Delhi High Court by observing Explanation 3C to be clarificatory as it explains Section 43B(d) the way it originally stood and does not purport to add a new condition retrospectively. Held, the

In Eko India Financial Services (P) Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax in W.P.(C) 5819/2021 dated August 03, 2021 the Hon'ble Delhi High Court directed the Revenue ('the Respondents') to refund the amount adjusted in excess of 20% of the

In M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. K. Bharathi and Ors [W.P.No.12957 of 2021 dated August 5, 2021], the petition has been filed under the writ of Mandamus directing the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai ('NCLT') to dispose of the app

The Hon’ble Kerala Authority for Advance Ruling ('AAR')noted from the facts submitted by the Applicant, it is seen that the discount received through credit note is a post supply discount. The applicant has not disclosed whether the discount is estab

The Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, relied on the case of Valerius Industries v. Union of India [Special Civil Application No. 13132 of 2019 dated July 31, 2019] which stated that there has to be some relevance to establish the sufficiency of gro

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-10, New Delhi dated 30.03.2017. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal.

Appellant, ITO (E), Ward 2 (3), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Revenue’) by filing the present appeal sought to set aside the impugned order dated 06.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-40, Delhi qua the assessment

This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 31.03.2016 of the learned CIT(A)-29, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21st February, 2017 of the CIT(A)-38, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2003-04.

These two appeals are against the order of confirming the penalty u/s 271D of Rs. 14 lac. for Assessment Years 2007-08 & 2008-09.