Present appeals are filed by assessee as well as revenue against order dated 30/04/2019 passed by the Ld.CIT (A)-2, Bangalore for assessment years 2012-13 and 2014-15.
Whether worthy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has not erred in law in not taking cognizance of assessee's own admission that M/s Asian Tube Trading is a fictitious firm of his parent Firm Mis Na yak Steel.
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 14.09.2017 of CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru, in relation to AY 2014-15.
Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad dated 27.6.2016 passed for Asstt.Year 2007- 08.
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13, arises from order of the CIT(A)-10, Ahmedabad dated 03-03-2017, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (�hereinafter called CIT(A)�) order no.
The above two appeals are filed at the instance of the above two assessees against separate order of the ld.CIT(A)-4, Ahmedabad even dated i.e. 30.10.2018 passed for the Asstt.Year 2013-14.
This assessee�s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, arises from order of the CIT(A)-9, Ahmedabad dated 21-01-2019, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short �the Act�.
Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-10, Ahmedabad dated 19.3.2019 passed for Asstt.Year 2014- 15.
This assessee�s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13, arises from order of the CIT(A)-5, Ahmedabad dated 17-08-2018, in proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short �the Act�.
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(with recording)
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(without recording)
CAclubindia
