Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

In Jenefa India vs. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(MD) No.16770/2019 decided on October 5, 2021] Hon'ble Madras High Court upheld the validity of Sl. No.102 of Notification No. 2/2017 dated June 28, 2017("Goods Exemption Notification") over Clause (ii)

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in P.R Commissioner of Income Taxv. M/s United Spirits Ltd. [I.T.A. No. 548/2015 c/w I.T.A No. 37/2010 decided on September 2, 2021] answered in favor of the M/s United Spirits Ltd. ("the Assessee")and held that the

The Hon'ble Gauhati High Court in Krit Kunal Dhawan v. State of Assam and Ors. [WP(C)/5642/2021, dated October 29, 2021] held that in a case where assessee is accused of passing on fake Input Tax Credit ("ITC") without actual moment of goods, a reaso

The Hon'ble CESTAT observed that, the agreement between producer/distributor engaged in business of production and distribution of films and the Appellant is of such nature that both the parties work independently and does not interfere or influence

The Hon'ble Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling ("MAAR") held that though the Applicant is supplying pure services but has failed to satisfy that how her activities of providing residential accommodation to underprivileged girls is covered under

In M/s Kamdhenu Agrochem Industries LLP [GST-ARA-112/2019-20/B-87 dated February 24, 2020], Hon'ble Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling ("MAAR") held that in a case where imported goods are sold and delivered directly from Container Freight Stat

The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s. Delta Power Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Commissionerate, Hapur [Final Order No. 51919/2021 dat

In M/s Gew India Pvt. Ltd. [KAR ADRG 63/2021 dated November 8, 2021] Hon'ble Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling ("KAAR") held that no separate registration is required for supply of works contract services in Karnataka by M/s L&T, Karnataka by th

Pune Tribunal disallows expense on which no TDS was deducted as the taxpayer claimed it as reimbursement of expense. The Tribunal opines that a shall be called as a reimbursement only when undiluted benefit, flowing from the incurring of expenditure

In M/s. Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore [ITA 3064 /BANG/2018, decided on November 10, 2021], Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("ITAT") held that guarantee commission paid in considerat