Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
In M/s Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. GST-ARA-68/2019-20/B-52 dated August 27, 2021], M/s Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd ("the Applicant") has sought clarification on the issue of whether the charges other than that of consideration of main constru
Secured Creditor will have precedence over Govt. Tax dues
Bimal Jain 10 September 2021 at 13:00
In Superintendent Central Excise & Customs v. M/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Anr. [Civil Appeal Nos. 6900-6901/2011 dated August 12, 2021], the current appeal has been filed after a decade since the last order dated January 03, 2011 by the Revenue
Penalty under Section 271G deleted for bonafide conduct of the taxpayer
Bimal Jain 10 September 2021 at 13:00
In Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. SSL-TTK Ltd. [T.C.A.No.776 of 2014 dated August 05, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the Order I.T.A.No.544/Mds/2011 dated February 15, 2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai ("
Is a manufacturer and exporter of computer software eligible for deduction u/s 10A of the I.T. Act?
Poojitha Raam 10 September 2021 at 09:37
This appeal was restored to the I.T.A.T. by the Hon�ble High Court in ITA No.338/2014 (judgment dated 18.01.2021).
Ld. CIT(A) excludes comparables like size and turnover & RPT for treating a company as a comparable
Poojitha Raam 10 September 2021 at 09:36
These cross appeals are directed against the order dated 23- 08-2013 passed by Ld CIT(A), Large Taxpayers Unit, Bangalore and they relate to the assessment year 2008-09.
Transfer u/s. 2(47)(v) of the IT Act so as to bring the capital gain to tax
Poojitha Raam 10 September 2021 at 09:36
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(Appeals)-1, Bangalore dated 28.12.2015 for the assessment year 2006-07.
TP adjustment made in software development segment and in respect of ITES segment
Poojitha Raam 10 September 2021 at 09:36
Both these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against CIT(A) - 1 , Hyderabad’s separate orders dated 19/05/2017 for AY 2012-13 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) and 271(1)(c) of the Income- Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
Criteria for a service being either �Royalty� or �Fee for technical services� under DTAA
Poojitha Raam 10 September 2021 at 09:33
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the A.O. u/s 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] and it relates to assessment year 2013-14.
Petition on restricting the disallowance made on account of agriculture income by CIT(A)
Poojitha Raam 10 September 2021 at 09:33
This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 27-06-2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Pune [�CIT(A)?] for assessment year 2009-10.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 14.03.2019 passed by Ld CIT(A), Mangalore and it relates to the assessment year 2016-17.
CAclubindia
