In M/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CE & ST, GURUGRAM [FINAL ORDER NO. 60893/2021 dated September 07, 2021], M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.("the Appellant") is in appeal against the impugned order wherein cenvat credit on event managemen
In T.D. Venkata Rao. v. Union of India [Appeal (civil) 2824 of 1992 dated December 08, 1998], the appeal in this case was filed by T.D. Venkata Rao ("the Appellant") challenging the validity of Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act").
In M/S. UPS INVERTER.COM & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. [W.P.(C) 4284/2021 dated September 09, 2021], M/S. UPS INVERTER.COM ("the Petitioner") filed petition for the grant of refund of IGST paid on goods exported by the Petitioner during the Transit
These batch of seven appeals filed by the Assessee are directed against the separate Orders Dated 12.05.2017 of the Ld. CIT(A)-30, New Delhi, relating to the A.Ys. 2006- 2007 to 2012-2013 respectively.
This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi dated 25.08.2017.
This appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeal), Pune-13 dated 25.03.2021 for the assessment year 2014-15.
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order dated 08.05.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”) relevant to the A.Y.2016-17. 2.
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-16, Kolkata dated 25.04.2019 for AY 2013-14 .
These are appeals by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) for the concerned assessment years.
Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-12, Mumbai [CIT(A)], dated 02/09/2019 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) on 28/03