Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
In M/s Jai Balaji Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs& Service Tax, Durgapur [Final Order No.75548/2021 dated August 25, 2021], M/s Jai Balaji Industries Limited ("the Appellant") has filed the current appeal being aggrieved
No penalty applicable if Service Tax was paid in cash immediately after the direction of Auditor
Bimal Jain 22 September 2021 at 15:51
In Sud Chemie Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodra [Service Tax Appeal No.10021 of 2019 dated September 02, 2021], Sud Chemie Pvt Ltd ("the Appellant") filed an appeal against the Order No. OIA-VAD-EXCUS-001-APP-287-2018-19 dated Augu
CSR expenses incurred to make donations to Trusts eligible for deduction
Bimal Jain 22 September 2021 at 15:51
In JMS Mining (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Kolkata-2 [IT APPEAL NO. 146 (KOL.) OF 2021 dated July 22, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the orderdated March 30, 2021 ("the Impugned order") passed by Ld. Principal
Salary of a person staying in India for more than 182 days being Resident is subject to Income tax
Bimal Jain 22 September 2021 at 15:50
In Tapas Kumar Basak v. Assistant Director of Income Tax, International Taxation-II &Ors. [W.P.O. No. 931 of 2007, dated September 16, 2021], Tapas Kumar Basak("the Petitioner")has challenged the impugned order dated January 25, 2007 passed by the Di
Mismatch in amount paid to related persons u/s. 40A(2)(b) reported in Audit Report and ITR
Poojitha Raam 22 September 2021 at 09:39
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Bengaluru [PCIT] passed u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] dated 2.3.2020 for the assessment year 2015-16.
Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-1, Ahmedabad dated 11.10.2018 passed for the Asstt.Year 2010-11.
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, arises from order of the CIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad dated 22-10-2018
Mechanism for quantification of penalty under the Income Tax Act
Poojitha Raam 22 September 2021 at 09:39
Present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against order of ld.CIT(A)-6, Ahmedabad dated 12.11.2018 passed for the Asstt.Year 2013-14.
AO finds assessee involved in unaccounted sales without payment of excise duty
Poojitha Raam 22 September 2021 at 09:39
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad on 10-01-2018 in relation to the assessment year 2011-12.
Meaning of 'transfer' under section 2 (47) of the Income Tax Act
Poojitha Raam 22 September 2021 at 09:39
These Revenue’s and assessee’s cross-appeals for AY.2008-09 arise against the CIT(A)-II, Hyderabad’s order(s) dated 11-11-2014, in case No.0270 / CIT(A)-II, Hyd /2014-15, involving proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act.
CAclubindia
