Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
ITAT: Even administrative orders have to be construct with rule of natural justice
Poojitha Raam 26 October 2021 at 09:42
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-40 dated 22.11.2019 and pertains to Assessment Year 2015-16.
This appeal by the assessee is directed towards the order of the CIT(A)-42, New Delhi dated 30.12.2016 pertaining to A.Y 2012-13.
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals], Meerut dated 29.01.2018 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10.
Proportionate disallowance of deduction claimed u/s. 80 IA of the Income Tax Act
Poojitha Raam 26 October 2021 at 09:37
ITA No.2234/Del/2019 is the appeal by the assessee preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-15, Delhi dated 28.12.2018 pertaining to A.Y.2010-11.
Order passed by Ld. Commissioner should always be in writing as per Section 250(6)
Poojitha Raam 26 October 2021 at 09:37
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee, wherein the assessee assails the correctness of the order dated 27.03.2018 of CIT(Appeals), New Delhi pertaining to 2013-14 assessment year. Although various grounds have been raised assailing the or
Order under Article 23 of India-Japan Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement
Poojitha Raam 26 October 2021 at 09:37
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 30.03.2021 framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 of the Income tax Act, 1961.
Are penalty proceedings vitiated if notice u/s 274 does not strike off irrelevant portion?
Poojitha Raam 26 October 2021 at 09:37
Present appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 19/05/2017 by the Ld.DCIT, Circle 4(1)(2), Bangalore.
The Honorable Karnataka High Court ("Karnataka HC") in the matter of M/S. Bundl Technologies Private Limited v. Union of India [WP 4467/2021 (T-RES) dated September 14, 2021], held that Swiggy’s payment made as goodwill gesture during investigation c
Jharkhand HC quashes vague SCN on wrongful availment of ITC
Bimal Jain 24 October 2021 at 09:24
The Jharkhand High Court (Jharkhand HC) in the matter of M/S. Nkas Services Private Limited v. The State of Jharkhand and Ors. [WP (T) No. 2444 of 2021 dated October 06, 2021] quashed the Show Cause Notice ("SCN") in respect of wrongful availment of
Demand cannot be confirmed by relying on third-party evidence not cross-examined
Bimal Jain 22 October 2021 at 09:46
The Hon’ble Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad ("the CESTAT") in the case of M/s Meera Pipes Pvt. Ltd. v. C.C.E. and S.T., Ahmedabad [Excise Appeal No.10276 of 2019 decided on October 11, 2021] has held that the department
CAclubindia
