In M/s Ananta Landmark Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 2814 of 2019 decided on September 14, 2021] Hon'ble Bombay High Court held that for an assessment to be reopened beyond a period of four years there must an om
In M/s Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories v. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax [Order No. 70247-70248/2021 dated November 5, 2021] Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ("CESTAT") held that in a case where
In M/s Siddharth Enterprises through Anr. v. The Nodal Officer [TS-625-HC(GUJ)-2021-GST dated October 14, 2021] Hon'ble Gujarat High Court observed that the direction of this Court to allow filing of declaration in form GST TRAN-1 and GST TRAN-2 by M
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nandlal Lohariya v. Jagdish Chand Purohit and Ors. [S.L.P. (C) Diary No. 24842 of 2020, decided on November 8, 2021] held that in each and every case where a litigant has lost the case on merits and is not guilty of negligenc
In M/s Alcoats [KAR ADRG 62/2021 dated October 29, 2021] Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling ("KAAR") held that job work services undertaken by M/s Alcoats ("the Applicant") by way of treatment or processing such as anodizing, plating, on the goo
Income Tax (“PCIT” in short ), Raipur-1 communicated to the assessee on 26.03.2021 passed under Sect ion 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
These two appeals by the Revenue arise out of the separate orders dated 28-10-2016 & 10-01-2017 passed by the CIT(A)-4, Pune in relation to the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad on 23-06-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the final assessment order dated 09.12.2020 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 15.03.2018 for the assessment year 2008-09.