The Hon’ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of Sherly Sany v. C.C, Cochin [Final Order No. 20812 / 2021 dated October 28,2021], while quashing an order of the customs authorities, held that the or
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s. Ferryman Trading Company v. Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) [FINAL ORDER No. 51910/2021 dated October 28, 2021], held that the confiscating office
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 21.10.2019 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2016-17.
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against final assessment order dated 22.10.2018 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2014-2015.
The present appeal has been f i led by the assessee against the order dated 29.05.2019 passed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
This appeals is filed by the assessee against the order dated 21/03/2018 passed by the CIT(A)-1, Noida for Assessment Year 2014-15.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. PCIT, Udaipur dated 01.02.2021 wherein the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal.
The present appeal has been f i led by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-44, New Delhi dated 24.11.2017.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A), Kota dated 06.03.2019
In Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sonu Realtors Private Limited [INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.956 OF 2017 dated October 11, 2021], Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax ("the Appellant") filed the appeal being aggrieved against Order dated July 20, 2016 passed b
Live class on PF & ESI Enrollment & Returns Filing(with recording)
CAclubindia
