Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
Registration is not a requirement for filling refund claim
Bimal Jain 06 December 2021 at 17:54
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s Blue River Capital India Advisory Services LLP v. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East [Final Order No. A/87046-87047/2021 dated Novem
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ("CESTAT") in the matter of Mr. Subodh Menon v. Commissioner of Customs, ACC Mumbai [Final Order No. A/87045/2021 dated November 03, 2021], held that under the provisions of Custom
Limitation period for granting refund not applicable to refund of Custom duty paid in excess
Bimal Jain 05 December 2021 at 18:49
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s FCI OEN Connectors v. Commissioner Of Central Tax & Central Excise, Cochin [Final Order No.20795/2021 dated October 21, 2021] held that when the
Rajasthan High Court quashes reassessment notice issued under Sec 148 of the Income Tax Act
mahendra gargieya 04 December 2021 at 09:11
The reassessment notice issued to the petitioners under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is quashed. However, it is left open to the assessing authority to initiate re-assessment proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Act, as amended
Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act cannot be given a retrospective effect
mahendra gargieya 03 December 2021 at 17:46
In that view of the matter, we do not find that the Tribunal has committed any error in setting aside the assessment. The counsel for the revenue however has strenuously argued that in view of Section 292BB inserted in the Income Tax Act, mere defect
Penalty demand and proposal of confiscation cannot be separated from Customs duty demand
Bimal Jain 03 December 2021 at 15:56
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s. Dhiren Enterprise v. Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai [Final Order No. A/87107/2021 dated November 09, 2021], ruled that the propo
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of John's Cashew Company v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin [Final Order 20792 /2021 dated October 18, 2021], allowed the refund of 4% of Special Additi
Karnataka AAR ruled that 5% GST applicable on packed and branded Pushti
Bimal Jain 02 December 2021 at 11:55
The Hon'ble Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling ("the Karnataka AAR") in the matter of M/s. Devanahalli and Hosakote Taluks MSPC [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 56/2021 dated October 29, 2021], ruled that Pushti is classified under HSN code 1106. If
Hon'ble High Court directed GST Authority to refund GST paid under wrong head
Bimal Jain 02 December 2021 at 11:55
The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court ("Punjab and Haryana HC") in the matter of SBI Cards & Payment Services Limited v. Union of India and others [CWP-8108-2021 (O&M) dated October 08, 2021], directed the Authority to refund GST worth Rs. 108 cr
In Rasi Nutri Foods [Order No. 39 AAR/2021 dated October 21, 2021] Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka ("KAAR") held that Notification 39/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated October 18, 2017 ("Concessional Rate Notification") read with G.O.M's No. 140
CAclubindia
