This appeal is filed by the assessee against order dated 01/09/2017 passed by CIT(A)-40, Delhi for assessment year 2014-15.
The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. They call in question Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the impugned amendments’, for
This Civil Appeal raises an important question of law concerning arbitration law in India and special enactments enacted by States concerning public works contract.
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2003-04 contests the order of learned first appellate authority passed on 31/12/2010 on certain grounds of appeal. The assessment was framed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) 13/03/2006.
This appeal in ITA No.753/Mum/2014 for A.Y.2008-09 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, in appeal No.CIT(A)-38/IT-170/2011-12 dated 29/11/2013 (ld. CIT(A) in short) in the matter of imposition of penalty u/s.271
This appeal in ITA No.5654/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2012-13 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-29/IT-196/ITO-18(2)(4)/15-16 dated 28/04/2015 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assess
These appeals in ITA No.7105/Mum/2017, 7106/Mum/2017, 7107/Mum/2017 & 7108/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2009-10, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai in appeal Nos.CIT(A)-50/IT-73/2016-17-AY
These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought
At the time of hearing of captioned appeal, none appeared for assessee. However, vide assessee’s counsel letter as placed onrecord, it transpires that the assessee is opting to settle the dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme),
These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought
Excel Mastery Program