Judgements by Guest

View Full Profile


The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee gainst the order dated 27.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].

Posted in Income Tax |   238 Views



The present appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the orders all dated 31.10.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’]. ITA 54/CHD/2020 is taken up first for adjudication.ITA 54

Posted in Income Tax |   109 Views



Heard Mr. J. D. Mistri, learned senior counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel revenue for respondent No.1; and Mr. R. V. Desai, learned senior counsel for respondent No.2.

Posted in LAW |   151 Views



Subject matter and reliefs sought for in all the writ petitions being identical, those were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

Posted in LAW |   128 Views



Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Posted in LAW |   104 Views



By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to forthwith grant and sanction interest on the refund amount after expiry of three months from the respective dates of applicatio

Posted in LAW |   89 Views



Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the counsels for the parties, heard fnally at the stage of admission.

Posted in LAW |   120 Views



It is the petitioner’s case that it owed monies to an entity, going by the name, Shridham Distributors Private Limited [in short 'SDPL']. According to the petitioner, the debt owed to SDPL was defrayed, by transferring Zero Coupon Optionally Convert

Posted in LAW |   114 Views



These petitions have been filed by the petitioner challenging the Show Cause Notice(s) dated 29.01.2020 and the consequent Order(s) dated 05.06.2020 and the Communication(s) dated 03.09.2020 of the respondent no. 1, proceeding with the inquiry agains

Posted in LAW |   147 Views



Both these appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2009-10 and 2012-13 are directed against CIT(A) – VI Hyderabad’s separate orders, both dated, 26/08/2015 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 ; in short “the Act”.

Posted in Income Tax |   118 Views