EASYOFFICE
EASYOFFICE
EASYOFFICE

Judgements by Guest

View Full Profile


The above captioned appeals are by the Revenue for A.Ys 2006- 07to 2010-11. This bunch of appeals were remitted back by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi directing the Tribunal for recording specific findings on the issue of attribution of 15% Revenue

Posted in Income Tax |   88 Views


Sri Omkar Chadha, New Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi

  Guest    30 November 2020 at 13:25

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-18 , New Delhi dated 05 .12.2016 .

Posted in Income Tax |   98 Views



This Revenue’s appeal for A.Y.2010-11 arises from Mumbai’s order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-37, in case No.CIT(A)-37/IT-206/ITO 25(2)(2)/2015-16 dated 27/02/2017, in proceedings u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinaf

Posted in Income Tax |   58 Views



This Revenue’s appeal for A.Y.2013-14 arises from Mumbai’s order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, in case No.CIT(A)-14/IT-45/16-17 dated 26/07/2018, in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as Act].

Posted in Income Tax |   132 Views



The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -18, Mumbai, passed u/s 271(1)(c) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.None appeared on behalf of the assessee, we heard the submissions of Ld. DR and considere

Posted in Income Tax |   67 Views


MANISHA AJAY SHAH, MUMBAI vs PR. CIT 30, MUMBAI

  Guest    30 November 2020 at 12:04

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -30, Mumbai ( in short ‘the PCIT”) dated 07/03/2019 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as ‘the Act’).

Posted in Income Tax |   151 Views



This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-45, Mumbai (in short ‘the CIT(A)’) dated 07.09.2018 for the Assessment Year 2011-12.

Posted in Income Tax |   100 Views


M/S. NIMBARK GEMS,, MUMBAI vs ACIT-16(3),, MUMBAI

  Guest    28 November 2020 at 16:16

This Assessee’s appeal for A.Y.2009-10 arises from Mumbai’s order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, in case No.CIT(A)-30/ACIT 19(3)/277/2011-12 dated 30/11/2018, in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to

Posted in Income Tax |   76 Views



This Assessee’s appeal for A.Y.2008-09 arises from Mumbai’s order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, in case No.CIT(A)-30/19(1)(2)/499/2013-14 dated 26/02/2018, in proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred t

Posted in Income Tax |   69 Views



This is an appeal by the revenue wherein the revenue is aggrieved that Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] has reduced the addition for bogus purchase of Rs. 3,76,530/- done @ 100% by Assessing Officer by sustaining

Posted in Income Tax |   93 Views