Judgements by Bimal Jain
View Full Profile
Limitation period for granting refund not applicable to refund of Custom duty paid in excess
Bimal Jain 05 December 2021 at 18:49
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s FCI OEN Connectors v. Commissioner Of Central Tax & Central Excise, Cochin [Final Order No.20795/2021 dated October 21, 2021] held that when the
Penalty demand and proposal of confiscation cannot be separated from Customs duty demand
Bimal Jain 03 December 2021 at 15:56
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of M/s. Dhiren Enterprise v. Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai [Final Order No. A/87107/2021 dated November 09, 2021], ruled that the propo
The Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ("CESTAT") in the matter of John's Cashew Company v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin [Final Order 20792 /2021 dated October 18, 2021], allowed the refund of 4% of Special Additi
Karnataka AAR ruled that 5% GST applicable on packed and branded Pushti
Bimal Jain 02 December 2021 at 11:55
The Hon'ble Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling ("the Karnataka AAR") in the matter of M/s. Devanahalli and Hosakote Taluks MSPC [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 56/2021 dated October 29, 2021], ruled that Pushti is classified under HSN code 1106. If
Hon'ble High Court directed GST Authority to refund GST paid under wrong head
Bimal Jain 02 December 2021 at 11:55
The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court ("Punjab and Haryana HC") in the matter of SBI Cards & Payment Services Limited v. Union of India and others [CWP-8108-2021 (O&M) dated October 08, 2021], directed the Authority to refund GST worth Rs. 108 cr
In Rasi Nutri Foods [Order No. 39 AAR/2021 dated October 21, 2021] Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka ("KAAR") held that Notification 39/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated October 18, 2017 ("Concessional Rate Notification") read with G.O.M's No. 140
The Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ("ITAT") in the matter of Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Circle: 4 (1) New Delhi [ITA. No. 477/Del/2021 dated November 09, 2021], directed the Assessing Officer ("AO") to delete
In Kewal Krishan v. Rajesh Kumar & Ors. Etc. [Civil Appeal Nos. 6989-6992 of 2021 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 2033-2036 of 2016 dated November 22, 2021] Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the payment of price is an essential part of a sale covered by
Nimbooz classified under the category of fruit juice based drinks and not lemonade: CESTAT
Bimal Jain 30 November 2021 at 09:44
In M/s Varun Beverages Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Excise [Final Order No. 70253/2021 dated November 10, 2021] Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad ("CESTAT") held that Nimbooz by 7 UP and Nimbus masala soda by 7 UP a
The AAR, West Bengal in response to Application presented by Mr. Vinayak Singh ("the Applicant") [Order No. 14/WBAAR/2021-22 dated October 8, 2021] has issued an advance ruling that the Applicant engaged in providing conservancy/solid waste managemen
CAclubindia
