Judgements by Bimal Jain

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court, ("the High Court") in Sri MunaPani v. State of Odisha (W.P.(C) No. 20996 of 2022) held that entertaining Writ Petition at the stage of notice would interrupt adjudication process and frustrate tax administration. Assess

The CESTAT, therefore, held that the CBEC was not given authority under Section 93 of the Finance Act, hence it is not permitted to provide exemptions or alter those already granted by the Central Government. As a result, the CBEC's circular cannot c

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Abi Egg Traders v. Assistant Commissioner, Salem II Division, O/o The Assistant Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax Central Excise [W.P.No.3773 of 2020] ruled in favor of the assessee by directing the d

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court, in the case of M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions v. State of Odisha & Others, [W.P.(C) No.38497 of 2021] granted major relief to contractors by staying the coercive steps against the contractors and ordered the State GST dep

The Telangana AAR, in lieu of an application filed by M/s. Bambino Pasta Food Industries Private Limited, [TSAAR Order No.52/2022] ruled that Corporate Social Responsibility ("CSR") expenditure for business is eligible for Input Tax Credit ("ITC").

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court ("the High Court"), in the case of M/s. Simon India Ltd. v. CT and GST Officer, Cuttack-II Circle, Cuttack and Anr. [W.P.(C) No. 26443 of 2022] ruled that, the final Goods and Services Tax ("GST") Audit Report shall be i

The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Sri Kolapudi Enoch Washington v. The Additional Commissioner (GST and Central Tax), [Writ Petition No. 21269/2022 (T-RES)] directed the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") Department to restore the cancelled

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Basanta Kumar Shaw v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Commercial Taxes and State Tax, [MAT 976 OF 2022 WITH CAN 1 OF 2022] held that in terms of Rule 86A(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, in the case of Chromotolab and Biotech Solutions v. Union of India, [R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16308 of 2020] ruled that the date of filing of the application by the assessee on common portal would be treated as

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s BBM Impex Pvt. Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) [Customs Early Hearing Application No.50414 of 2022 with Customs Appeal No. 51662 of 2022-SM] has held that, the appellant is entitled