Judgements by Bimal Jain

View Full Profile


The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s. Savex Technologies Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. STC/AAR/06/2022 dated August 17, 2022] has held that, Interactive Flat Panel Screens used only for data processing purposes will attract Goods and Service Tax ("GST")

Posted in GST |   379 Views



The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s Parsakente Collieries Limited [Advance Ruling No. STC/AAR/08/2021 dated December 17, 2021] has ruled that nil rate of Compensation Cess is applicable on supply of coal rejects by the coal washery, as long as

Posted in GST |   310 Views



The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Md. Yusuf v. State Tax Officer, Bureau of Investigation [MAT 1426 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2022 dated September 28, 2022] has held that the assessee cannot approach the High Court when the first remedy is still

Posted in Income Tax |   108 Views



The Hon'ble Supreme Court in AMD Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, Lucknow and Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 108 of 2023dated January 9, 2023] upheld the order passed by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court holding that due to advancement in tech

Posted in Corporate Law |   187 Views



The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Shekhar Resorts Limited v. Union of India [Civil Appeal No. 8957 of 2022 dated January 5, 2023] has held that the assessee cannot be denied relief under Sabka Vishwas (Legal Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 ("SVLDR Sc

Posted in GST |   390 Views



The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s HPL Electric and Power Ltd. [Order No. STC/AAR/02/2022 dated May 2, 2022] has ruled that installation services for highway lighting systems cannot be considered as "Construction services" under SI. No. 3(iv)

Posted in Others |   219 Views



The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in M/s. Varshan Enterprises v. Office of the GST Council [Writ Petition No.10637 of 2021, dated December 12, 2022]held that the Revenue Department cannot retain any amount that has been paid as tax as a result of

Posted in GST |   296 Views



The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of M/s. Drishty Communication Private Limited v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot [Service Tax Appeal No. 135 of 2012 dated January 5, 2023] has held that, advertising in newspapers or media agencies, where the role of the ass

Posted in Service Tax |   216 Views



Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 48/2022 dated December 12, 2022

Posted in Custom |   330 Views



The CESTAT, Mumbai in Credence Property Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 85780 of 2020 dated January 5, 2023] has held that once the buyer of a flat cancelled the booking and the consideration for s

Posted in Service Tax |   209 Views



CCI Pro
Follow us