Judgements by Bimal Jain

The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of M/s. Kanchan Supplier v. State of Punjab and Ors. [Civil Writ Petition No. 1629 of 2024 dated January 24, 2024] held that the Assessee has the right to appeal against the Order. Further, the ve

The Hon'ble Tripura High Court in the case ofKamrul Nahar v. Union of India [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 253/2023 dated January 03, 2024], directed the bank to permit the Petitioner to remit amount of pre-deposit as required in terms of Notification No

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s.Friends Media Add Company v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax[W.P.(C) No. 1260 of2024 dated February 12, 2024] modified the GST cancellation order to operate prospectively from the date o

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of M/s. Inox India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 10341 of 2016-DB dated March 07, 2024], held that once the legislature by way of an enactment has provided certain exemptions, any not

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Ralco Synergy Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of State Tax and Ors. [W.P. No. 5554 of 2024 dated March 5, 2024] set aside the Impugned Order passed by the Revenue Department, thereby holding that, GST

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Rainbow Stones (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) [W.P. No. 4510 of 2024 dated February 26, 2024] allowed the writ petition, thereby setting aside the Assessment Order on the ground that the order is

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Siemens India Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 986 of 2019 dated February 09, 2024], relying upon sub-section (7) of Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") ad

The Hon'ble Gauhati High Court in the case of Rajesh Mittal vs Union of India [WP(C) No. 371 of 2024 dated January 25, 2024] relying upon the provision of sub-clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of SreeKrishna Hot Dip Galvanizers v. State of Karnataka [Writ Petition No. 25648 of 2023 dated January 16, 2024], held that the time spent in preferring appeal before the wrong authority should be exclude

The Gujarat AAR in the matter of Kohler India Corporation (P.) Ltd., In re [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2024/03 dated January 05, 2024], held that where the Applicant under the Factories Act, 1948 ("the Factories Act") entered into a contract with