Judgements by Bimal Jain

The Hon’ble AAR, Maharashtra in the matter of Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry ("DCCI")[GST-ARA-35-2019-20B dated May 24, 2021], has held that a liaison office of the DCCI to be an ‘intermediary’ which is providing services. Further held that,

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Abdul Mannan Khan v. the GST Council &Ors. [WPA 236 of 2020 dated January 04, 2021] declined to interfere in a matter and dismissed the petition of the assessee seeking rectification of the Form GSTR-1 for the perio

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in K.I. International Ltd. v. the Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) [W.P. No. 16328 of 2020 dated June 23, 2021] set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department rejecting the claim of the assessee that disentitled th

The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court, in the case of Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd vs. Union of India Ors. [WPT No. 94 of 2021 decided on June 24, 2021] has granted a stay on Recovery Order passed by the Revenue Department, denying Input Tax Credit (“I

The Hon’ble ITAT, Kolkata in the case of ITO v. M/S Star Consortium [Income Tax Appeal No. 04/KOL/2020 C.O. No. 08/Kol/2020, dated April 7, 2021] dismissed an appeal filed by the Revenue Department and held that the Assessing Officer ('the AO') canno

The AAR, Gujarat in the matter of M/S I-Tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/10/2021 decided on January 20, 2021] held that, Input Tax Credit ('ITC') in relation to Central Goods and Services Tax ('CGST') and State Goods and Serv

The Hon'ble ITAT, Ahmedabad in Swatiben Anilbhai Shah v. DCIT [Income Tax Appeal Nos. 1513, 1514 and 1515/Ahd/2019 decided on January 29, 2021] held that where assessee purchased shares and recorded them in investment portfolio and it was justified t

The AAR Gujarat in the matter of M/S. Enpay Transformer Components India Private Limited [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/01/2021, dated January 20, 2021] has held that Indian company is liable to pay GST on reverse charge basis for amount paid as inte

The Hon’ble Bombay HC in Dharmendra M. Jani v. Union of India [W.P.  No. 2031 of 2018 dated June 09, 2021] Justice Ujjal Bhuyan held that Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Act, 2017 ('the IGST Act') is ultra vires of Articles 14,

The Hon’ble High Court, Madras in Mohammed Haroon Shaik Mohammed v. the Additional Commissioner of Customs [WP (MD) Nos. 3917 & 3918 of 2020 and WMP (MD) No. 5459 of 2021 decided on April 26, 2020] held that the assessable person cannot be denied acc