In M/s.Joseph Tea Company ltd. v. State Tax Officer [WP(C)No. 17235 of 2020 decided on June 17, 2021] M/s. Joseph Tea Company ltd. ('the Appellant') is a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act ('the Kerala VAT Act'), had migrated from
In M/s. Nezone Tubes Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) [W.P. No. 4176 of 2014 and M.P. No. 2 of 2014 decided on July 14, 2021] M/s. Nezone Tubes Limited ('the Petitioner') filed a writ petition on the issue that whether the benefit of Input
In M/s. Air India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs [Custom Appeal No. 40035 of 2021 – SM dated July 09, 2021], M/s Air India Ltd. ('the Appellant') was granted custodianship permission for the export of cargo. The Appellant, as a custodian, are duty b
In Ashok Kumar B. Chowatia v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chennai [W.P. Nos. 31167, 31170, 31172, 31174 of 2018, W.M.P. Nos. 36373, 36376 and 36379, 36380 of 2018 dated April 16, 2021]. Ashok Kumar B. Chowatia ('the Petitioner') challenge
In Re: Global Gruh Udyog [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/21/2021 decided on July 8, 2021] Global Gruh Udyog ("the Applicant") raise issue w.r.t. classification of puri papad and unfried papad ("Impugned goods").
In C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-I v. Palak Designer Diamond Jewellery [Excise Appeal No.10239 of 2020 decided on July 23, 2021] the revenue filed an appeal against Order-in-Appeal wherein the Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter on the ground of adjudic
In GMR Infrastructure Ltd. v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [ITA No. 1036 of 2017 decided on July 6, 2021] GMR Infrastructure Ltd. ("the Appellant") filed an appeal against order by ITAT, Bangalore w.r.t. to the issue that whether the Appella
The Hon'ble CESTAT, Bangalore in General Motors Technical Centre India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 20400 of 2020, dated April 1, 2021] set aside the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) rejecting the refund
In Re: M/s. Vajra Infracorp India Private Limited [TSAAR Order No.03/2021 decided on July 19, 2021] wherein the assesee is provider of taxable services of construction of residential complexes.
In M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. v. DCIT(LTU)-2 [ITA No. 2397/Mum/2019 decided on June 25, 2021], M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. ('the Appellant') filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Mumbai ('the Respondent') computing set-off
25 Hours GST Scrutiny of Return and Notice Handling(With Recording)