GST Judgements

Sri Ramohalli Krishnrao Karthik of Magal Agencies, 33, Ground, BalajiKrupa, 4thCross, Krishnarajavanam, Mysuru, 570008, having GSTIN 29AFJPK2970B1ZH, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017, read with Rule 104

M/s. Aadhya Gold Private Limited (called as the 'Applicant' hereafter) No.37/38,1st Floor, SBI Colony, 80 Feet Road, 3rd Block, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560 034having GSTIN 29AAPCA3170M1Z5, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97

M/s Airbus Group India Private Limited, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Applicant' or 'Airbus India' or 'the Company'), 4 & 4A, XYLEM, 4th Floor, Dyavasandra Industrial Area, Mahadevapura Post, Bengaluru - 560048, Karnataka having GSTIN 29AAGCA1513R

The Hon’ble Tripura High Court in Shri Sentu Dey v. State of Tripura [Criminal Petition No. 14/2021 dated May 28, 2021] quashed the order passed for police investigation by the Judicial Magistrate in a matter of alleged GST offence. Held that, once t

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Union of India & Ors. v. M/s Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [Special Leave Petition(Civil) Diary No(s). 1434/2021 dated June 29, 2021] has imposed penalty of 25000/- INR on the Revenue Department for dela

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017, and SGST, Act 2017 are in parametria and have the same provisions in the like matter and differ from each other only o a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a

The Hon’ble AAR, Maharashtra in the matter of Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry ("DCCI")[GST-ARA-35-2019-20B dated May 24, 2021], has held that a liaison office of the DCCI to be an ‘intermediary’ which is providing services. Further held that,

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Abdul Mannan Khan v. the GST Council &Ors. [WPA 236 of 2020 dated January 04, 2021] declined to interfere in a matter and dismissed the petition of the assessee seeking rectification of the Form GSTR-1 for the perio

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in K.I. International Ltd. v. the Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) [W.P. No. 16328 of 2020 dated June 23, 2021] set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department rejecting the claim of the assessee that disentitled th

The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court, in the case of Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd vs. Union of India Ors. [WPT No. 94 of 2021 decided on June 24, 2021] has granted a stay on Recovery Order passed by the Revenue Department, denying Input Tax Credit (“I