The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in M/s. Wipro Limited India v. the Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 16175 of 2022 (T-Res) dated January 6, 2023] has allowed the assessee to rectify the errors committed at the time
The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in the matter of M/s Mahendra Sponge and Power Limited v. Assistant Commissioner State Tax (W.A. No. 267 of 2022 dated January 1, 2023)quashed and set aside the order passed by the Single Judge directing the assess
The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Skyline Automation Industries v. State of Uttar Pradesh [Writ Tax No. - 1512 of 2022 dated January 2, 2023] quashed the demand order passed in Form DRC-07, by the Revenue Department, on the grounds that a notice in
The Applicant is a part of a global organisation dealing with renting of reusable equipments for shared use amongst industrial and retail sectors throughout the supply chain.
The Commissioner or the authorized officer may, on his own or based on submission of the assessee may examine the matter afresh. After being satisfied that the ITC availed initially considered being fraudulently or ineligible, it is no more ineligibl
The credit will not available to the extent the same is embedded in the cost of food recovered from such employees. The AAAR relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CCE Vs Ultratech Cement [2010 (260) ELT 369 (Bom)].
The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the matter of M/s. Gayatri Projects Limited & anr. v. The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Durgapur Charge & Ors. [M.A.T No.2027 of 2022 with I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2022 dated January 5, 2023] set aside the ruling pa
The AAR, Tamil Nadu in the matter of Ola Electric Technologies Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. 31/AAR/2022 dated July 29, 2022]has held that the transfer of rights to perform integration testing, installation, and marketing of software from an e-vehicle manufac
The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in M.P. Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat [R/Special Civil Application No. 3796 of 2022 dated March 9, 2022] quashed and set aside the demand order passed in Form DRC-07 by the Revenue Department, on the grounds
The applicant recovers nominal amount from the employees for canteen facility - The applicant discharge GST @5% on the taxable value which is sum total of the cost of the canteen service provider plus 10% notional mark up.
Live Course on GSTR 9 & 9C for FY 24-25(Detailed discussions, FAQ, Case studies and Live demo of GSTR 9/9C on GST Portal)