GST Judgements

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Utility Labour Suppliers v. Commissioner of C.E.-Ahmedabad-II [Service Tax Appeal No. 10780 of 2022-DB dated November 26, 2024] held that demand of service tax cannot be raised when the tax liability has already b

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case Vijay Trading Company v. Additional Commissioner[Writ Tax No. 1278 of 2024 dated August 20, 2024]set aside order passed under Section 130 under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") fol

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Krish Corporation v. Commissioner of C.E. and S.T.-Surat -I [Service Tax Appeal No. 10686 of 2014-DB dated November 26, 2024] allowed the appeal and reduced the tax demand wherein the tax demand has been raised so

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of H K Enterprise v. Union of India & Ors [R/Special Civil Application No. 14119 of 2024 dated November 27, 2024] quashes rejection of refund application of Integrated Goods and Service Tax ("IGST") paid on

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Kasturi & Sons (P.) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Appeals-1), Chennai [W.P. No. 18642 of 2024 dated July 10, 2024] wherein the Hon'ble High Court taking into consideration Rule 1

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Baazar Style Retail Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax [W.P.A. No. 16185 of 2024 dated August 19, 2024] set aside the order and notice issued by the State GST Department when proceedings have alrea

The Kerala AAR, in the case of Sai Service (P.) Ltd., In re [Advance Ruling No. KER/09/2024 dated January 10, 2024] held that where demo cars are crucial for sales promotion, since, prospective customers prefer to test drive cars before they make a d

The Rajasthan AAR, in the case of M/s Balveer Singh [Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2024-25/2017 dated September 20, 2024] slaked/hydrated lime containing less than approximately 98% of the calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide, are classifiable under CTH

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune [Civil Appeal No's 10409-10410 of 2014 November 20, 2024] upheld the rights of the telecom operators and infrastructure companies to claim CENVAT

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s.SS Traders v. Joint Commissioner (ST) (Intelligence) [Writ Petition No. 15363 of 2021 dated August 16, 2024] remanded back the orderwhere the Assessee was mulct with huge tax liability vide Assessment