Steel products were supplied by the respondent to one M/s.Diamond Engineering Pvt. Ltd. [“the company”] from 21.09.2015 to11.11.2016, as a result of which INR 24,20,91,054/- was due and payableby the company. As many as 51 cheques were issued by the
By its judgment dated 24 October 2019, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2 held that a person who is ineligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 20163 to submit a resolution plan, is also barred from proposing a scheme of
Challenging the order passed in I.T.A.No.1843/Mds/2012 in respect of the assessment year 2009-10 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, ''D'' Bench, the Revenue has filed the above appeal.
To issue any appropriate writ, order or direction tothe respondents permitting the petitioner to edit andupload actual entries in GSTR-3b for the Month of May- 2019 which is at the submission stage;
All these appeals, assail the judgment and orderof the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi(hereinafter referred to as “NCLAT”) dated 5.8.2020, passed in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 344345 of 2020.
The present Appeals raise two important issues for our consideration : (i) the period of limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the 1996 Act”); and (ii) whether theCourt may refuse to mak
This batch of statutory appeals (being Civil AppealNos. 1827/2018, 1875/2018, 1832/2018 and 3213/2018) under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 arises from acommon final order of the Central Excise and Service TaxAppellate Tribunal (‘CESTAT’) date
By its judgment dated 29 August 2019, the National Company Law Tribunal stayed the termination by the appellant of its Power Purchase Agreement with Astonfield Solar (Gujarat) Private Limited . The order of the NCLT was passed in applications4 moved
Heard Mr. Prasannan Namboodiri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Pradeep Jetly, learned senior counsel for the respondents.
Heard Mr. Prasannan Namboodiri, learned counsel for thepetitioners and Mr. Pradeep Jetly, learned senior counsel for the respondents.