This appeal raises significant issues of public importance, engaging as it does, the interface between citizens and their businesses with the fiscal administration. Legislation enacted for the levy of goods and services tax confers a power on the tax
The present appeal raises an interesting question – as to whether two companies incorporated in India can choose a forum for arbitration outside India – and whether an award made at such forum outside India, to which the Convention on the Recognition
The petitioner had registered himself as a dealer under TNVAT Act, 2006. Following the implementation of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the petitioner migrated into GST regime and got registered under the new Act.
In this Writ Petition, petitioner has assailed the Assessment Order No.41055 dt.31.03.2021 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the period April, 2016 to March, 2017.
By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 23.09.2020 passed by theJoint Commissioner of Customs, Gr. VA, Nhava Sheva-V i.e., respondentNo.3 and further seeks a direction to the re
The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that his application filed under the provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (in short „2020 Act‟) has been rejected.
This appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, hereinafter referred to as the ‘IBC’, is against a judgment and order dated 22nd November 2019, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), dismissing Company
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 476 of 2020 has been preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by the Small ScaleIndustrial Manufactures Association, Haryana for an appropriatewrit, direction or order directing the Union of India and ot
This batch of civil appeals, special appeals and transfer cases essentially relate to the resolution plan in the corporate insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 concerning the corporate debtor, Jaypee Infratech
The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 6.2.2013 whereby a writpetition filed by respondent No. 41 herein was allowed, holding that the tenant in the premises in question was representi