This Writ Appeal is filed against the Final order dated 02.08.2017passed in W.P.No.6566 of 2004. The respondents 1 to 5 herein filed W.P.6566 of 2004 seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order dated 19.02.2004
The First Respondent by Order No. TIN: 33141603667/2014-15 dated 17.07.2017 had assessed the liability of the Petitioner for tax for the year 2014-2015 and imposed penalty under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the
These appeals arise out of a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 10.10.2019 by which a Single Judge’s order dated 14.01.2019 transferring a winding up proceeding pending before the High Court to the National Company Law Tribu
Aggrieved by the non-inclusion of principles of natural justice in theMaster Directions on Fraud (‘the Master Circular’, for short), dated01.07.2016, issued under Section 35-A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 by the Reserve Bank of India, aggrieve
These appeals have been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) challenging the common order dated 07.07.2014 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai (for brevit
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan pronounced the Reportable judgment of the Bench comprising His Lordship, Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.Subhash Reddy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah.
The appellant M/s. ACME Warehousing Private Ltd. has filed thisintra court writ appeal, only aggrieved by the observation of the learnedSinge Judge in paragraph 2 of the order dated 25.08.2020 made in W.P.No.8086 of 2020.
(Judgment of the court was made by Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J.)The present Appeals are squarely covered by the decision of this Courtin PVR Ltd. v. CTO (W.A.No.685, 694 to to 697 decided on 15.10.20020) which dealt with the question of taxability of the En
PRAYER IN W.A.No.582 of 2020: This Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters of Patent to set aside the order dated 11.06.2019 made in W.P.No.34079 of 2007.
“The delicate light of the law favours release unless countered by the negative criterianecessitating that course. The correctiveinstinct of the law plays upon release orders by strapping on to them protective and curative conditions. Heavy bail from