By these petition(s)/appeal(s)/case(s), we are called upon by the petitioners to undertake a comprehensive and heightened judicial scrutiny regarding the permissibility of the Central Vista Project1 of the Government of India. Diverse issues concerni
By the impugned judgment and decree dated 10/06/2020, passed by the VI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru City, the suit for setting aside the award dated 26/12/2013 was dismissed. Hence, this appeal.
The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. They call in question Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the impugned amendments’, for
This Civil Appeal raises an important question of law concerning arbitration law in India and special enactments enacted by States concerning public works contract.
Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 5 of the Prize Chits Money CirculationScheme (Banning Act), 1978 and Section 65 of the IT Act. Hewas arrested on 25.05.2019. Incomplete charge sheet wasfiled on 22.07.2019.
08.01.2021: Upon proof of service of notice on Respondent, its appearance was awaited on the last date of hearing. Even today, nobody has turned up to defend the appeal on behalf of Respondent. In the given circumstances, we proceed to hear learned c
05.01.2021 This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant-Operational Creditor against Impugned Order dated 09th September, 2020 passed in CP (IB) No. 184/BB/2020 by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Bengaluru Bench). By the Impugned Order, the Adjudica
04.01.2021 Appellants are the ‘Operational Creditors’ of the Corporate Debtor - Reliance Infratel Limited. They are aggrieved of the impugned order dated 3rd December, 2020 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Court-I,
The present application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 253/2018 registered under Sections 409/467/468/471/120B IPC at P.S. Economic Offences Wing, Delhi.
The short question involved in this appeal is, whether the acceptance of a conditional offer with a further condition results in aconcluded contract, irrespective of whether the offerer accepts thefurther condition proposed by the acceptor. This ques