LAW Judgements
Will non-remission of tax amount to wilful evasion attract penal provisions?
Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16
This criminal original petition has been filed to quashing theproceedings in C.C.No.425 of 2019 on the file of learned AdditionalChief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. The petitioners are facing trial for the offences under Sections 276 C(2) of the Inco
Heard Mr.Shenoy, learned counsel for the petitioners;Ms.Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.1, Mr.Walve, learnedstanding counsel, revenue for respondent No.2; Mr.J.B.Mishra,learned counsel for respondent No.3; and Mr.Modi, learned senior counsel
ASHISH SARAF Vs. PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4
Guest 06 March 2021 at 17:38
Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.
Allowing the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme to the petitioners
Guest 06 March 2021 at 17:38
Present writ petition has been filed challenging the OM dated 17 W.P. (C) 1569/2021 th February, 2020 to the extent that it declares that only those candidates whose results for recruitment were declared before 01st January, 2004 against vacancies o
The appellate jurisdiction of this Court under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) has been invoked to challenge the judgement and order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT” or “Appellate Tribunal”) dated
Lupita Saluja Vs DGGI (Delhi High Court)
Guest 24 February 2021 at 10:36
Present petition has been filed under section 438 Cr.P.C. seekinganticipatory bail to the petitioner in relation to the enquiry/investigation being conducted by the respondent under Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017.
Requirement of “unjust enrichment” in case of pre deposit under section 129E of the Customs Act
Guest 24 February 2021 at 10:36
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents to refund the amount of Rs.88,44,510/- paid by the petitionerduring the pendency of its appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.A.Nos.3558 and 3559 of 2000 along with
The issues raised in SCN being time barred left open to be decided by the respondent
Guest 24 February 2021 at 10:36
This petition has been preferred with the following prayers:- W.P.(C) 842/2021
Power of Section 171 of the CGST Act 2017 and Rules 122, 126 and 133 of the CGST Rules 2017
Guest 24 February 2021 at 10:36
The challenge in this writ petition is to the vires of Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 and Rules 122, 126 and 133 of the Central Goods and Services Rules, 2017.
The Union Bank of India has approached this Court challenging the provisional attachment order dated 15th October, 2020 passed by the PMLA Adjudicating Authority i.e., Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, under the provisions of Prevention of
CAclubindia
