Income Tax Judgements

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 28th August, 2019 of the CIT(A), Ghaziabad, relating to assessment year 2015-16.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 25-04-2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2014-15.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-8, New Delhi [ The ld CIT (A)] dated 15.01.2020 wherein, the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [ The Act] by the Joint

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dt. 01/06/2019 of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana.

The assessee to explain why the arm’s length price (ALP) of the AMP expenditure should not be determined by applying the Bright Line Test (BLT) method.

This appeal in ITA No.4612/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-1/143/DCIT(CPC)/2018-19 dated 16/05/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment p

The assessee, a resident company, is engaged in the business of shipping agency. For the assessment year under dispute, assessee filed its return of income on 30.11.2011 declaring total income of Rs.4,58,57,900/-.

This appeal in ITA No.40/Mum/2020 for A.Y.2007-08 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-30/19(1)(2)/13153/2015-16 dated 26/09/2016 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessme

Revenue Authorities have erred in not granting the benefit of the Treaty to the assessee just for the reason that the assessee has not submitted the Tax Residency Certificate from Austria.

In The A.C.I.T. Central Circle-15, New Delhi v. Shri Krishan Lal Madhok 672, Tulsi Farms, Opp. Nanda Hospital Chattarpur, New Delhi ITA No. 3917 to 3921/DEL/2017 [A.YS 2006-07 to 2012-13] & ITA No.6648/DEL/2017 [A.Y 2007-08], the A.C.I.T. Central Cir