This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Mumbai [in short 'the CIT(A)�] dated 30/09/2019 for the assessment year 2007-08.
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3 passed u/s 271(1)(c) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
This is assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2005-06 against the order of CIT(Appeals)-4, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2016. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal.
Captioned appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 23.10.2019 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)�14, Mumbai for the assessment year 2016-17
This appeal is filed by Revenue while the Cross Objection is filed by the assessee, against the order of CIT(A)-1, Hyderabad dated 26.10.2017 relating to A.Y. 2014-15.
This is assessee�s appeal filed against the order of CIT(A)-7, Hyderabad dated 26.11.2018 relating to A.Y. 2014-15.
This is assessee's appeal for the Assessment Year 2008-09 against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Hyderabad Dt.15.11.2019 confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer.
This is assessee's appeal for the Assessment Year 2015-16 against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Hyderabad dt.17.10.2019
In the matter of M/s. Perfect Probuild P. Ltd. v. DCIT, Circle 76(1) [ ITA No. 1034/Del/2018 order dated August 05, 2021] before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”), Delhi, it is held that, TDS has to be deducted u/s 194C of Income Tax Act, 19
Adjustment of refund is in excess of 20% against outstanding demand payable which is contrary to the guidelines contained in the Office Memorandum, dated 29.02.2016, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(with recording)
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(without recording)
CAclubindia
