The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the revision order dated 19.1.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(LTU), Bangalore for assessment year 2010-11 u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short]. The assessee is challenging the validity of same
These seven appeals at the instance of the assessee and five cross objections preferred by the Revenue are directed against various orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment years are 2007-2008, 1010-2011 to 2015-2016.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(Appeals), Belgaum dated 28.01.2019 for the assessment year 2013-14
Present appeals are filed by assessee as well as revenue against order dated 30/04/2019 passed by the Ld.CIT (A)-2, Bangalore for assessment years 2012-13 and 2014-15.
Whether worthy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has not erred in law in not taking cognizance of assessee's own admission that M/s Asian Tube Trading is a fictitious firm of his parent Firm Mis Na yak Steel.
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 14.09.2017 of CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru, in relation to AY 2014-15.
Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad dated 27.6.2016 passed for Asstt.Year 2007- 08.
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13, arises from order of the CIT(A)-10, Ahmedabad dated 03-03-2017, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (�hereinafter called CIT(A)�) order no.
The above two appeals are filed at the instance of the above two assessees against separate order of the ld.CIT(A)-4, Ahmedabad even dated i.e. 30.10.2018 passed for the Asstt.Year 2013-14.
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(with recording)
CAclubindia
