Income Tax Judgements

In the instant case, the matter was to be remitted to the Assessing Officer for the following reasons. Firstly, in the instant case there was no factual finding recorded by the High Court as to whether the ‘sales made through the export houses by the

It was not in dispute that when the order of the Commissioner was passed, there were two views on the word ‘profit’ in section 80HHC. The problem with section 80HHC is that it has been amended eleven times. Different views existed on day when the Com

The power to levy a surcharge on income-tax is traceable to article 271 read with entry 82 of list I of seventh schedule to the Constitution of India. That power is not traceable to section 4 of the 1961 Act. Every year the Finance Act is enacted by

The assessee was engaged in the business of printing and publication of yellow pages directory. It claimed deduction under section 80Q in respect of profits derived from such business. The Assessing Officer as well as the Commissioner (Appeals) denie

There is a conflict of opinions between the judgments of the Division Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Dilip N. Shroff (supra) on one hand and on the other in the case of Shriram Mutual Fund (supra). Secondly, the object behind enactment of

Assessee/appellant was a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Oord ACZ Marine Contractors BV, Netherlands [VOAMC]. It executed a dredging contract at Port Mundra for Adani Gujarat Port Ltd. in the relevant previous year and since it followed completed cont

Where a deposit stands in the name of a third person and where that person is related to the assessee, in such a case the proper course would be to call upon the person in whose books the deposit appears or the person in whose name the deposit stands

Held by the Hon`ble Court that, by virtue of its right by way of a lease form month to month or for a period not more than one year assessee is not owner of the house property as per section 27(iiib). Therefore income is assessable as business income