Whether order passed without giving opportunity to be heard is justified in law?
Whether addition made on the basis of loose slips found during search is justified in law?
Whether interest income on accumulated profits of minor who is partner in a firm, will be included in the total income of parent?
Whether sub-partnership is entitled to exemption under section 10(2A) of Income-tax act, 1961?
Whether Appellate Tribunal can recall order passed by it earlier?
Whether loss on sale of share whose physical delivery not taken by the assessee is speculation loss?
Self assessment tax paid on the next working day instead of on the date given in sec. 139 because that day was a holy day, interest levied for delay is sustainable.
Whether income from mall management and business centre under agreements with users for providing services and limited rights granted to users while owner ship remains with owner is income from business or house property?
Where the issues sought to be raised before the High Court are purely issues of fact and the Tribunal, being the final fact finding authority, has returned a certain set of facts, no perversity can be found in such findings and consequently, no quest
(i) S. 94(7) was inserted prospectively w.e.f. 1.4.2002 to disallow dividend stripping losses. If the argument of the Revenue that even transactions prior to s. 94(7) can be disallowed is accepted, it will render s. 94(7) redundant and also lead to a