Income Tax Judgements
Crystal Sound and Music Private Limited, Mumbai Vs. ITO 12(1)-4, Mumbai
Guest 09 October 2020 at 18:00
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated 22.03.2019 and pertains to the assessment year (A.Y.) 2013-14.
M/s Radha Developers (P) Ltd., Delhi Vs. ITO, New Delhi
Guest 09 October 2020 at 18:00
These appeals are filed by the assessee against the respective impugned order dated 21.2.2017 passed in the quantum appeal and order dated 27.3.2018 passed in the penalty appeal relating to assessment year 2006-07 by the Ld.CIT(A)-7, New Delhi & Ld.
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle - 5, Pune Vs. Manav Reality, Pune
Guest 07 October 2020 at 10:47
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-8, Pune on 28-02-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.
Ruddhi Softtech Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income tax -2, Nashik
Guest 07 October 2020 at 10:47
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23-03-2017 passed by the Pr.CIT(A)-2, Nashik u/s.263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in relation to the assessment year 2007-08.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle - 6, , Pune Vs Suma Shilp Ltd,, Pune
Guest 03 October 2020 at 17:18
This appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-4, Pune dated 01.03.2017 for the assessment year 2012-13 as per the following grounds of appeal on record:
ACIT 21(1), MUMBAI Vs. M/s ELECTROMAG METHODS, MUMBAI
Guest 03 October 2020 at 17:18
These captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-(Appeals)-33, Mumbai [in short the ‘CIT(A)’] and arise out of the assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 19
M/s TRANSLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD, MUMBAI Vss DCIT 15(3)(1), MUMBAI
Guest 03 October 2020 at 17:18
This is an appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant assessment year is 2015-16. The appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] and arises out of the assessment completed u/s 143(3
M/s Saraf Company Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata Vs I.T.O,Ward-9(4), Kolkata
Guest 03 October 2020 at 17:18
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-15,Kolkata dated 15/02/2019 for A Y. 2014-15.
Manju Fatepuria, Kolkata Vs I.T.O.,Ward-61(4), Kolkata
Guest 03 October 2020 at 17:18
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-19,Kolkata dated 27/06/2019 for A Y. 2013-14.
M/s Pranay Vinimay Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata Vs I.T.O.,Ward-8(3), Kolkata
Guest 03 October 2020 at 17:18
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-3, Kolkata dated 15/05/2019 for A.Y. 2014-15.
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
