Excise Judgements
No Artificial Price to Evade Duty
Garima 20 February 2008 at 15:47
The applicant M/s Berger Paints India Ltd. is a manufacture of paints and varnishes which are the goods notified and subjected to assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of MRP of the product. One of the products manu
Reversal of Modvat Credit
Rahul Tibrewal 16 February 2008 at 11:22
Whether the reversal of Modvat credit can be treated as non-availment of credit.
Clearance of Damaged Goods on Payment of Duty
Garima 15 February 2008 at 14:27
High Court not to interfere at Show cause Notice stage
Supreme Kothari 28 January 2008 at 10:34
Central Excise – High Court not to interfere at Show cause Notice stage : Madras High Court
BUSINESS AUXILIARY SERVICE
Ravikumar.G 20 September 2007 at 14:06
Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Business auxiliary service - Period from October, 2003 to February, 2005 - Whether where assessee was engaged in collecting payments on behalf of its clients
MUMBAI, JUNE 25, 2007 : SINCE the appellant failed to produce proof of export within the statutory period of 6 months in respect of excisable goods cleared from their factory demand notices were issued for recovery of Central Excise duty. The D
CAclubindia
