Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
The assessee has filed these four appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 52, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Citation :
ITA 4884/MUM/2018
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT &
SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA Nos. 4884, 4885, 4886 & 4887/Mum/2018
(A.Ys: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12)
Ashwin Kumar N Sheth
Plot No. 7, Hatkesh CHS,
Vile Parle (W), Mumbai –
400056.
PAN/GIR No. : AAHPS2888R
Appellant
Vs.
DCIT, CC 4(2)
Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.
Road, Mumbai – 400020.
Respondent
Appellant by : Shri Chetan Karia, AR
Respondent by : Shri Brajendra Kumar, DR
Date of Hearing 01/01/2021
Date of Pronouncement 01/01/2021
O R D E R
PER BENCH:
The assessee has filed these four appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 52, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. At the time hearing, the Ld. AR of the assesseesubmitted that the assessee is intended to settle thetax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme2020’(VSVS2020) and filed an application in Form No. 1 & 2 under VSVS Rules 2020. Contra, the Ld. DRhas no objections.
To know more in details find the attachment file
Excel Mastery Program