Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
The assessee has filed the appeal against theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -48, Mumbai, passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Citation :
ITA Nos. 2439/Mum/2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT &
SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA Nos. 2439/Mum/2019
(A.Y: 2009-10)
Ajay Offset Printers
101/102 Dhanraj Ind Estate
Sitaram, jadhav Marg,
Lower Parel, Mumbai –
400013.
Appellant
Vs.
ITO – 2(1)(1)
Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai.
PAN/GIR No. : AAAFA2027P
Respondent
Appellant by : Shri Dalpat Shah, AR
Respondent by : Shri Brajendra Kumar, DR
Date of Hearing 01/01/2021
Date of Pronouncement 01/01/2021
O R D E R
PAVAN KUMAR GADALE:
The assessee has filed the appeal against theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -48, Mumbai, passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. At the time hearing, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is intended to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’(VSVS2020) and filed an application in Form No. 1 & 2 under VSVS Rules 2020. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.
To know more in details find the attachment file
Excel Mastery Program