Court :
ITAT Delhi
Brief :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 31st January, 2019 of the CIT(A)-20, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2010-11.
Citation :
ITA No.1719/Del/2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH : SMC-1 : NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.1719/Del/2019
Assessment Year: 2010-11
Santosh Sahi,
B-497, New Friends Colony,
New Delhi.
PAN: AAWPS8472Q
Appellant
vs
ITO,
Ward-61(5),
New Delhi.
Respondent
Assessee by : Shri Subhash Singhal, CA
Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing : 28.07.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 28.07.2021
ORDER
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 31st January, 2019 of the CIT(A)-20, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2010- 11.
2.Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, these all relate to the ex parte order of the CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs.1,78,023/- to the total income of the assessee on account of income from house property.
3.Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite number of opportunities granted, the ld.CIT(A), in the ex parte order passed by him, confirmed the addition made by the AO.
4.Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite number of opportunities granted, the ld.CIT(A) in the ex parte order passed by him, sustained the addition. It is the submission of the ld. Counsel that on the last date of hearing, the assessee had moved an adjournment application and the same was not considered by the CIT(A).
5.In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself, i.e., on 28.07.2021.
Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement