Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
Aforesaid appeals by revenue in case of two different assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2011-12 to 2016-17 assail separate orders of first appellate authority. However, the facts as well as issues are common in all the years and it is admitted position that adjudication in any one year shall equally apply to other years also.
Citation :
I.T.A. No. 06/Mum/2021
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
DCIT Cen Cir. 7(1) R. No. 676B, 6th floor Aaykar Bhavan, M. K. Road Mumbai-400 020
vs
Dr. D. Y. Patil International Academy Dr. D. Y. Patil Knowledge City Charholi BK, Via Lohegaon Pune-412 105.
I.T.A. No. 1966/Mum/2020
Revenue by:Shri Rajat Mittal – Ld. Sr. DR
Assessee by:Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala – Ld. AR
Date of Hearing: 27/10/2021
Date of Pronouncement: 01/11/2021
Whether On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. ClT(A) is justified in allowing the assessee to carry forward the deficit, being excess of expenditure over receipts, to subsequent years and the same is eligible to be set-off with the income of subsequent years by relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), ignoring the fact that there was no express provision in the I T Act, 1961 permitting allowance of such claim.
2. The material facts are that the assessee being resident Trust was subjected to search action on 27/07/2016 and accordingly, an assessment was framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 28/12/2018. In the assessment, Ld. AO determined deficit of Rs.1404.02 Lacs and denied the carry forward of the same for set-off in subsequent years.
3. So far as the assessee’s appeals are concerned, Ld. AR has submitted that the assessee is not pressing these appeals and therefore, the same may be dismissed. Keeping in view the same, the captioned appeal of the assessee stand dismissed as being not pressed. Resultantly, all the captioned appeals stands dismissed. Order pronounced on 01st November 2021.
Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement