Brijesh Upadhyay
(Practicing Chartered Accountan)
(31 Points)
Replied 02 July 2007
Service tax liability would be arised under the head of Business Auxiliary Service.
It can't be considered as export of service as it is under 'c' category. Service should at least be performed outside india which is common condition for all the categories. In present case, it is very difficult to establish this fact so it can,t be considered as export of service.
Modified Opinion:
Hello Mr.Nikhil Gupta (Indirecttax consultant-Big 4 Delhi)
I'ad gone through your reply. Firstly, thanks for inviting my attention towards amendment in Rule3, i'ad skipped it. Beg your pardon for that. I'ad given the opinion haphazardly.
Furhter, in respect of your point regarding sub agent service to agent may be out of the purview of Business Auxiliary service as per definition given in 65(19) of Finance Act,1994 as amended in which definition is exahustive and it requires direct relatioship between client and agent, I agree on this point.In present case subagency is established not direct relationship between abroad based unit and mumbai based agency established so it is out of the purview of business auxiliary service if Banglore based unit is pure agent otherwise it comes to client and agent relationship and service tax is levialble. Now, with regards to export of service, as service is not directly given to abroad unit in both the cases so it can't be considered as export of service. It also strengthen our grounds in both the cases.Having said that, scope of litigation from Authority can't be ruled out but ultimately this stands will prevail.
And so far as I know there is also a caselaw to support this aruguement.
And I don't think it is necessary to take consultancy of others in this matter.
Regards,
CABrijesh Upadhyay
B.Com.,LL.B. A.C.A.
Pursuing UPSC(Main)