Retirement of directors
ARSHAD (student-CA_final) (74 Points)
16 August 2016Retiring-5
Non retiring-3
Additional-4
How many and who all will retire at the next AGM?
ARSHAD
(student-CA_final)
(74 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
Mandar
(Associate)
(561 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
Additional Directors as per Section 161(1) of CA 2013 hold office upto the date of AGM, he cant be counted for calculation of retirement by rotation. The additional Directors can either be regularized at the said AGM or resign from the post of directorship.
ARSHAD
(student-CA_final)
(74 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
Abhimanyu
(CA)
(316 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
Abhimanyu
(CA)
(316 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
ARSHAD
(student-CA_final)
(74 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
ARSHAD
(student-CA_final)
(74 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
Abhimanyu
(CA)
(316 Points)
Replied 16 August 2016
Abhimanyu
(CA)
(316 Points)
Replied 20 August 2016
Abhishek
(CA FINAL)
(54 Points)
Replied 05 July 2018
Dear Abhimanyu
It is no where written in the Act that Additional director shall not be included in "Total no. of directors" while computing Minimum number of rotational directors. However, such Additional director(s) are always non-rotational because their tenure has been fixed by the Act itself i.e. till next AGM. Though by complying Section 160 such additional director can become regular director in the company.
Abhishek
(CA FINAL)
(54 Points)
Replied 05 July 2018
Dear Abhimanyu
1. A director filling a casual vacancy is appointed by the Board, same as in case of an additional director. So, as per your reasoning, a director filling a casual vacancy shall not be included in TNOD. Do you agree?
2.As per Sec. 152(2), every director shall be appointed in GM (unless otherwise provided in any other provision of the Act). I also agree that additional directors are appointed in BM, and not in GM. But, from these 2 statements, how can you arrive at the conclusion that additional directors shall not be included in TNOD? Still, if this conclusion is accepted, the same conclusion shall apply to a director filling a casual vacancy, and so a director filling a casual vacancy shall not be included in TNOD. Do you agree?