resulting company

Page no : 2

vipin kumar CA (CA) (194 Points)
Replied 25 September 2009

issue is on 1/4/2008 one company exist, demerger happen on 30.8.2008 and a part of demerged company merge in to another existing company on 1.4.2008, it means resulting company can exist before demerger

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Shakya Roy Chowdhury (student- CA final) (40 Points)
Replied 27 September 2009

Originally posted by :vipin kumar
"	issue is on 1/4/2008 one company exist, demerger happen on 30.8.2008 and a part of demerged company merge in to another existing company on 1.4.2008, it means resulting company can exist before demerger	"

vipin, in this case you are not only talking about a demerger, but also a subsequent merger whereby the demerged division of the company merges with some other existing company. this can always happen , but I guess everybody explained rightly that Demerged company cannot be an existing Co. in the light that there is no subsequent merger occuring in the case!