Ad free CAclubindia and daily updates on your mobile. Subscribe Now!

Not filed it returns since 2002

IMRAN AHMED (PROP) (27 Points)

11 July 2015

Dear Experts,

One of my friends father firm who has filed income tax returns since 1976 and continued to file till 31/03/2002.

From 01/04/2002 he has business loss upto 31/03/2012. So he skipped filing returns. from 01/04/2012 his firm does makes some profit. so please tell me what is the procedure for filing of IT returns from 01/04/2012.

Reply
Follow
Share

3 Replies

skjadvt (Tenancey expert. ) (49 Points)
Replied 09 August 2015

I want to file return of AY2013-2014, how it can be done

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Z ( ) (2965 Points)
Replied 09 August 2015

@ IMRAN AHMED

Assessee should have filed return since had he done so he would be entitle to carry forward the losses [business] for 8 Assessment Years

When you said firm , is it proprietorship firm or partnership firm ? [I am presuming it to be proprietor]

For F.Y 13-14 return could have been filed till 31.03.15 u/s 139(4)

Z ( ) (2965 Points)
Replied 09 August 2015

For period prior to that , you can try filing return u/s 119(2)(b) [See below]

But to do that you must have reasonalble reason for not filing the return, if its not then return will most probably be rejected.

[Although you can file return in manual form but that act only as prima facie evidence of your income]

SECTION 119 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - INCOME-TAX AUTHORITIES - INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REFUND CLAIM AND CLAIM OF CARRY FORWARD LOSSES UNDER SECTION 119(2)(b)

CIRCULAR 9/2015 [F.NO.312/22/2015-OT], DATED 9-6-2015

In supersession of all earlier Instructions/Circulars/Guidelines issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (the Board) from time to time to deal with the applications for condonation of delay in filing returns claiming refund and returns claiming carry forward of loss and set-off thereof under section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, (the Act) the present Circular is being issued containing comprehensive guidelines on the conditions for condonation and the procedure to be followed for deciding such matters.

2. The Principal Commissioners of Income-tax/Commissioners of Income-tax (Pr.CsIT/CsIT) shall be vested with the powers of acceptance/rejection of such applications/claims if the amount of such claims is not more than Rs.10 lakhs for any one assessment year. The Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief Commissioners of Income-tax (Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT) shall be vested with the powers of acceptance/rejection of such applications/claims if the amount of such claims exceeds Rs.10 lakhs but is not more than Rs. 50 lakhs for any one assessment year. The applications/claims for amount exceeding Rs.50 lakhs shall be considered by the Board.

3. No condonation application for claim of refund/loss shall be entertained beyond six years from the end of the assessment year for which such application/claim is made.This limit of six years shall be applicable to all authorities having powers to condone the delay as per the above prescribed monetary limits, including the Board. A condonation application should be disposed of within six months from the end of the month in which the application is received by the competent authority, as far as possible.

4. In a case where refund claim has arisen consequent to a Court order, the period for which any such proceedings were pending before any Court of Law shall be ignored while calculating the said period of six years, provided such condonation application is filed within six months from the end of the month in which the Court order was issued or the end of financial year whichever is later.

5. The powers of acceptance/rejection of the application within the monetary limits delegated to the Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT/Pr.CsIT/CsIT in case of such claims will be subject to Following conditions:

i.		At the time of considering the case under Section 119(2)(b), it shall be ensured that the income/loss declared and/or refund claimed is correct and genuine and also that the case is of genuine hardship on merits.
ii.		The Pr.CCIT/CCIT/Pr.CIT/CIT dealing with the case shall be empowered to direct the jurisdictional assessing officer to make necessary inquiries or scrutinize the case in accordance with the provisions of the Act to ascertain the correctness of the claim.

6. A belated application for supplementary claim of refund (claim of additional amount of refund after completion of assessment for the same year) can be admitted for condonation provided other conditions as referred above are fulfilled. The powers of acceptance/rejection within the monetary limits delegated to the Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT/Pr.CsJT/CsIT in case of returns claiming refund and supplementary claim of refund would be subject to the following further conditions:

i.		The income of the assessee is not assessable in the hands of any other person under any of the provisions of the Act.
ii.		No interest will be admissible on belated claim of refunds.
iii.		The refund has arisen as a result of excess tax deducted/collected at source and/or excess advance tax payment and/or excess payment of self-assessment tax as per the provisions of the Act.

7. In the case of an applicant who has made investment in 8% Savings (Taxable) Bonds, 2003 issued by Government of India opting for scheme of cumulative interest on maturity but has accounted interest earned on mercantile basis and the intermediary bank at the time of maturity has deducted tax at source on the entire amount of interest paid without apportioning the accrued interest/TDS, over various financial years involved, the time limit of six years for making such refund claims will not be applicable.

8. This circular will cover all such applications/claims for condonation of delay under section 119(2xb) which are pending as on the date of issue of the Circular.

9. The Board reserves the power to examine any grievance arising out of an order passed or not passed by the authorities mentioned in para 2 above and issue suitable directions to them for proper implementation of this Circular. However, no review of or appeal against the orders of such authorities would be entertained by the Board.

1 Like