@ Mr Rakecha,
So basically you chose to ignore my pointed rebuttals. You are hiding under your 'mass speeches' and jingoistic language. Basically all this is aap-type politics. Saying one represent the masses and the masses are intelligent enough is the typical aap-type anarchistic attitude we have got used to now.
+
Are there matters in our profession that needs improvement? Of course yes. But is rebellion - by defacing the image of ICAI- the method? No. Especially not from a experienced CA.
+
I find my debater extremely wedded to his business of coaching etc that he is unable to give an independent opinion on this matter. Sir, please give me evidence to the contrary and I will change my mind. But all I am seeing is your attitude of protecting the business of coaching classses. Fact is, like IIT, ICAI has also taken a tough stance against rote-learning offered by these coaching classes. ICAI is blaming the poor quality of students due to coaching classes which teach them set patterns, ignoring concepts. This is similar to what IIT did by mandating CBSE to conduct entrace exams henceforth based on school syllabus alone. This one stroke removed the business potential of Kota/Hyderabad based coaching mandis.
+
Sir, the fact is your business is affected by ICAI's recent move of focussing on practical questions which are not covered by coaching classes. Rather that changing your coaching material and methods you are attacking ICAI to improve passing rate. Very convenient.
+
All that you are saying is more and more CAs should pass and they should get higher and higher salaries. Unfortunately salaries are not only a function of what qualification one has but also qualities like - communication skills, organisation skills- that a candidate can bring to the table. Post the global financial crisis, companies are wary of adding cost (finance dept) to their structure. But once economies come of the recession, once investment cycle kicks in, companies will again hire and would need more and more finance people. These salaries that you quote are recession level salaries and things will improve once the economy comes back to steam.
+
Two things that can improve the standing of ICAI in the decades to come
1) Make examination highly practical and highly conceptual that students will understand only by deep self-learning and introspection.
2) By doing the above, the business of coaching should 'naturally' cease to exist. Else make private coaching centres accredited to ICAI based on strict criteria.
These criteria include the coachers should have practical experience and contributed articles in ICAI Journal, IIM research papers, regular contributor to popular newspapers such as business-standard, economic times etc They should have appeared before income tax appellate cases or company law tribunals etc. They could be associated with ICAI accounting standards board, contributes to draft exposures on emerging issues etc. I mean these people should have concrete verifiable achievements and not just be self-declared experts.