Originally posted by : !..SaNKeT..! | ||
Very Interesting One.....thank you for Sharing... If you have any material Regarding that case...plz let me know.... I m also Interesting in this case... Have a Good day... |
Manmohan ACA, CS
(Chartered Accountant )
(14243 Points)
Replied 03 August 2011
Originally posted by : !..SaNKeT..! | ||
Very Interesting One.....thank you for Sharing... If you have any material Regarding that case...plz let me know.... I m also Interesting in this case... Have a Good day... |
File is at https://itatonline.org/archives/?dl_id=439
Santhosh Poojary
(SIEMPRE AHÍ PARA TI)
(15607 Points)
Replied 04 August 2011
Very Intersting and unique case study, never heared before.
Thanks for sharing.
dig vijay
(ok)
(151 Points)
Replied 04 August 2011
Hemant
(Student)
(243 Points)
Replied 09 August 2011
Thanx Sunny for sharing such an interesting read :)
Got any more such stuff, please share. It helps to relax !
mridul savio Pinto
(articled trainee )
(1477 Points)
Replied 13 August 2011
Originally posted by : Member (Account Deleted) | ||
ha ha truly n interesting case law :) , ya indeed it wud have been great to read the arguments too... |
thanx for sharing |
narendrakamath
(CA Student)
(69 Points)
Replied 21 August 2011
ya very intersting case law ...........
heart is an asset for human being ......BUT under plant defination heart is not included.........
so.....he can't claim deduction.........
thank u for sharing ...........
R SUBRAMANIAN
(NA)
(56 Points)
Replied 22 August 2011
Referring to the case law in question, if any employee of an establishment / office / department had to undergo an operation, normally the department reimburses the same depending on their status and permissible levels. Obviously the department will claim the same as revenue expenditure, which is not part of salary. In case of self employed professionals why this should not be allowed if it is genuine and backed by documents?