HOW WAS LAW ?

overall; i had a decent exam; not as good as audit. i left 10 marks straightaway ; the one of excutive council(i was kicking myself as i had skipped that thinking itnaa lambaa kaise aayega); and then the following question.

The "retirement deed" and the question about share certificate; i asnwered but i cudn answer as it as satisfactorily as i wanted.

Lot of my friends were isgusted with the paper as it had no option and the question we left was of chapter which was termed neglible by our sir

Hay........... Overall law paper was easy.... but it was bit lengthy.........thats it......

can sum1 tell me how 2 prepare 4 cs executive.i have my xam in dec n gave pcc 1 st group only now. 

 i gave pcc it was ok not bad 

i have heard 4m my fnds that the paper was good but it was lengthy and need time

Dear Friends

I have cleared my 1^st group(CA PCC) & in that I secured 172 marks. Now I am preparing for 2^nd group some of mine friends told me that if I am having above 150 marks in any of the group u can take relief of that marks to the extent of exceeding 150 i.e. (172-150)=22 so I have to secure 128 marks in the 2^nd group in next attempt with 40 marks in each subject because previously I have given both groups so I can take this benefit.

very easy

This time papers are quite easy as compare to June 2009.

No dear, you dont have the benifit of 22 marks as one get the set off when appearing both the groups together.

dear akash, what naveen said is true..!

Sub :lAW CA FINAL OLD refer Q6(b)(1) where interalia it was stated that CAG HAS APPOINTED kol& CO TO CODUCT SUPPLEMENTARY AUDIT OF XYZ LTD..according to section 619(3)(b) CAG authorises any person to conduct supplementary audit of Govt. co.and in prctical situation CAG never appoints firms to perform suplementary audit.Can any body can share his experience that CAG has appointed audit firms to conduct supplementary audit of goverment company.As far as my knowledge goes CAG ITSELFperforms supplementary audit with its own resources.